How did the Reagan Revolution exemplify New Federalism?

The Reagan Revolution is often associated with the concept of New Federalism, which aimed to shift power and resources from the federal government back to the states. One of the most significant ways this was achieved during Reagan's presidency was through the consolidation of categorical grants into fewer block grants.

Categorical grants are specific federal funds allocated for particular purposes, with strict guidelines on how they can be used. In contrast, block grants provide states with more flexibility and discretion in how they use the funds, allowing them to address local needs more effectively. By moving toward block grants, Reagan sought to reduce federal control and allow states to tailor their programs and spending according to their unique circumstances. This shift exemplified the principles of New Federalism, which emphasized state and local autonomy over federal mandates.

Other options do not accurately represent the goals of the Reagan Revolution in relation to New Federalism. For instance, increasing tax rates for state funding contradicts the idea of reducing federal intervention and promoting state independence. Decentralizing power entirely from the states would eliminate the balance intended by New Federalism. Likewise, promoting federal oversight over all state programs runs counter to the very foundation of the movement, which aimed to enhance state power and reduce federal control.