What aspect of federalism is highlighted by the ruling in Gonzalez v. Raich?

The ruling in Gonzalez v. Raich emphasizes the federal government’s power in regulating drugs, particularly through the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. In this case, the Supreme Court held that the federal government has the authority to regulate the production and use of marijuana, even when it is grown for personal, medical use in states where it is legal under state law. This decision reinforces the concept that the federal government can enact laws that may override state legislation when it is deemed necessary for regulating interstate commerce, in this instance, the illegal drug trade.

This case illustrates the broader principle of federalism where there is a division of authority between the federal and state governments. While states have the power to legislate on many issues, such as drug use, the federal government maintains the right to regulate interstate issues and enforce federal laws. The ruling effectively underscored that federal law can take precedence in certain areas, highlighting the ongoing tension and balance within the federalist system regarding state versus federal powers.